Traylor v. Traylor
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtKunkle, J.
The entire contention of both counsel for plaintiff' in error and counsel for defendant in error is based upon this agreement.
We shall, therefore, limit our consideration of the case to the record which consists of the certified copies of journal entries and the admitted property settlement entered into between the parties.
It is admitted that plaintiff in error and defendant in error prior to the divorce jointly held the title to certain real estate on 20th Avenue in this city upon which there was a mortgage held by The Continental Mortgage Company.
The agreement, among other things, provides…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Harris v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Saslow v. SaslowOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
- Addison v. AddisonOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
- Hogan v. HoganOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
- Speer v. SpeerLucas County Court of Common Pleas · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.