Legal Opinion

State v. Yough

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 30, 2011No. A-67 September Term 2010, 066950PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Albin

Trials are not perfectly orchestrated productions. The testimony of witnesses may not always be predictable, particularly in criminal cases where depositions are not a typical tool of discovery. On the stand, a witness may give testimony that is different from or more expansive than an out-of-court statement recorded by the police. In many instances, discrepancies will advantage a defense attorney attempting to discredit a witness—but not always. Every witness’s digression from a prior statement cannot be grist for the granting of a new-trial motion.

In this case, the victim of a robbery…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  2. State v. MacOnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  3. State v. LocurtoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  4. State v. HarveySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  5. State v. SimonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. Jamil McKinney(073070)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  2. State v. Santino J. Micelli (070453)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  3. State of New Jersey v. Kashif K. PattersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
  4. State v. HerbertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
  5. State v. Humfrey A. Musa (073268)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API