Legal Opinion
State v. Jamil McKinney(073070)
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided August 27, 2015No. A-74/75-13/A-76-13PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge CUFF
(temporarily assigned) delivered the opinion of the Court.
These consolidated appeals arise from an intrusion into an apartment by three armed men. Al-Tariq Wardrick and Jamil McKinney (together defendants) were identified as two of the three intruders and were charged in a seventeen-count indictment. Wardrick and McKinney were tried together by a jury and convicted of several offenses, including first-degree robbery and second-degree burglary. Each defendant appealed his conviction. Normally, their appeals would have been assigned to the same part of the Appellate Division and…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Yeager v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- State v. AfanadorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- State v. Carl J. Garrison(076537)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
- State v. David Bueso(074261)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
- DALILA CZUKERBERG VS. STATE-OPERATED SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, ETC. (L-8847-15, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021
- IN THE MATTER OF MONIQUE SMITH, IRVINGTON TOWNSHIP, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY (NEW JERSEY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
- IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 40:55D-19 FOR A DETERMINATION THAT THE MONTVILLE-WHIPPANY 230KV TRANSMISSION PROJECT IS REASONABLY NECESSARY FOR THE SERVICE, CONVENIENCE OR WELFARE OF THE PUBLIC (NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.