Legal Opinion

Beaman v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 1922No. 11,013PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court (A713) ; Theophilus J. Moll, Judge. Action by Sarah E. Beaman against the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. From a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, J.

Complaint by appellant against appellee for damages on account of the death of her son, which it is alleged was caused by the negligence of appellee. The court at the conclusion of appellant’s evidence in chief instructed the jury to return a verdict in favor of appellee. A verdict and judgment having been rendered against appellant, she appeals and assigns as error the action of the court in overruling her motion for a new trial, the specifications of which are: (1) that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence; (2) that it is contrary to law; (3) that the court erred in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MeansIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Davis v. Mercer Lumber Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co v. CrolyIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Riehl v. Evansville Foundry Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Indianapolis, Greenwood & Franklin Railroad v. HubbardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Charters v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Union Traction Co. v. Ringer, Admr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API