Legal Opinion
Subia v. Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 5, 1975PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLouis Wallach, J.
In an action for a declaratory judgment declaring that the plaintiff is entitled to recover no-fault benefits under an automobile liability insurance policy issued by the defendant to the plaintiff, the latter moves for summary judgment.
The operative facts are not denied. On September 17, 1973 the defendant issued an automobile liability policy to the plaintiff for a one-year period. Effective February 1, 1974, pursuant to the New York Comprehensive Automobile Insurance Reparations Act (Insurance Law, art. XVIII), the policy was amended to include no-fault benefits. Although the date the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rushing v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Deso v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Lauritano v. American Fidelity Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Lauritano v. American Fidelity Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Greenwich Bank v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. of HartfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nassau Insurance v. EbinNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- Koretnicki v. Firemen's InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Metropolitan Radiological Imaging, P.C. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2005
- New York & Presbyterian Hospital v. Elrac, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004