Legal Opinion
Driscoll v. Carpenters District Counsel
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 11, 1988No. 01673PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MONTGOMERY, Judge:
This action was instituted by Plaintiff-Appellants Cecelia Driscoll and William Dailey, claiming that they were the subjects of discrimination in job referrals by the Defendant-Appellee labor organizations. Their Complaint asserted that they were denied job referrals through a “Hiring Haul (sic)” job referral system maintained by the Appellee, as a result of intentional sex discrimination against Ms. Driscoll, and retaliation against her father, Mr. Dailey, because he complained of the alleged sexually discriminatory treatment experienced by his daughter. They based their…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Overly v. KassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Brotherhood Of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees, An Association v. The Atchison, Topeka And Santa Fe Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Driscoll v. Carpenters District CouncilSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees v. AtchisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988