Legal Opinion

United States v. Rico

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 26, 2006No. Nos. 05-10315, 05-10420PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Defendant-Appellant Sam Joseph Rico was convicted of two counts of transportation of illegal aliens in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) and (B)(iii). Rico challenges the legality of the stop and appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress. The government cross-appeals the sentence.

We affirm the denial of the motion to suppress and remand for resentencing.1

I

Rico argues that the stop of the vehicle was not supported by reasonable suspicion. Whether an investigatory stop is supported by reasonable suspicion is a mixed question of fact and law that is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Terri PruittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. PruittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. PruittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API