Legal Opinion

In Re Michal

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 17, 1968No. 28PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.

When the trustees opened an account in the bank and deposited funds of the trust estate therein, a contractual relation between them and the bank was created, whereby the bank became the debtor of the trustees. Nationwide Homes v. Trust Co., 267 N.C. 528, 148 S.E. 2d 693; Bank v. Weaver, 213 N.C. 767, 197 S.E. 551; Woody v. Bank, 194 N.C. 549, 140 S.E. 150, 58 A.L.R. 725. The right?, if any, of the petitioner, as surviving trustee, to draw a check upon that account and to proceed against the drawee bank for its refusal to honor the check arises out of and is governed by that contract. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Woody v. . BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. In Re SimmonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Nationwide Homes of Raleigh, N. C., Inc. v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Merchants Bank v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. In Re Estate of SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holloway v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Reliance Insurance v. North Carolina National BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Matter of BidstrupCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API