Legal Opinion

Reliance Insurance v. North Carolina National Bank

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 16, 1979No. 7826SC180PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

At the outset, we note that defendant, although properly grouping its exceptions and assignments of error in the record, *426has failed to bring them forward in his brief as required by Rule 28(e) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. We nevertheless proceed to treat the assignments of error in the record as though they had been properly brought forward.

The facts of this case are not in controversy. Defendant’s assignments of error all relate to the trial court’s conclusions of law. Defendant first contends that it was not required as a matter of law to give notice of the levy to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harris & Harris Construction Co. v. Crain & Denbo, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Troitino v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Shaw v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. In Re MichalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Southern Electrical Supply Co. v. Raleigh County National BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Holloway v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API