Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Bertram

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 7, 2003No. 1010892Published

1Opinion of the Court

884 So.2d 889 (2003)

Ex parte Patricia Norman BERTRAM.

(In re Patricia Norman Bertram

v.

State of Alabama).

1010892.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 7, 2003.

Rehearing Denied November 21, 2003.

Thomas M. Haas, Mobile, for petitioner.

William H. Pryor, Jr., atty. gen., and Andy S. Poole and Yvonne A.H. Saxon, asst. attys. gen., for respondent.

JOHNSTONE, Justice.

The defendant Patricia Norman Bertram was convicted of violating Subsections (a)(2) and (h) of Section 32-5A-191, Ala.Code 1975, "felony driving under the influence." The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed in an opinion, Bertram v. State, 884…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Castillo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  5. United States v. ResnickSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API