In Re Paternity of IC
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, Justice, Retired.
Mother appeals the district court’s Nunc Pro Tunc Order for Visitation and Child Support, contesting the district court’s determination of visitation, child support, costs, and attorney’s fees. The district court did not abuse its discretion in reaching its decision, and we affirm.
I.ISSUES
Appellant, KC (Mother), submits the following for review:
Did the district court abuse its discretion in its decisions regarding visitation, child support, and attorney fees?
Appellee, KJM (Father), responds:
1. Whether the district court abused its discretion in awarding visitation.
2.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Martin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Reavis v. ReavisWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Clark v. AlexanderWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Dowdy v. DowdyWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Pinther v. PintherWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Durham v. DurhamWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Jag v. State, Department of Family Services, Division of Public Assistance & Social ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Ggv v. JlrWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Opitz v. OpitzWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Paternity of JwhWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.