Opitz v. Opitz
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BURKE, Justice.
[11] Gary Kent Opitz challenges the amount of child support ordered by the district court. We affirm the district court's decision.
ISSUES
[12] Mr. Opitz presents these two issues for our review:
1. Whether the district court abused its discretion by imputing income to Mr. Opitz in determining his child support obligation.
2. Whether the district court violated Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 20-2-307(b) (Lexis-Nexis 2007) by failing to set forth specific findings for deviating from Wyo ming's presumptive - child guidelines. support
Ms. Opitz presents an additional issue:
8. Whether Ms. Opitz…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Paul v. PaulWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Bereman v. BeremanWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
- Hendrickson v. HendricksonWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Raymond v. RaymondWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Appalachian Railcar Services, Inc. v. Boatright Enterprises, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
- Womack v. SwanWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Andrew P. Johnson v. Katie L. JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- Egan v. EganWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Randall Thomas Bailey v. Sara Elizabeth BaileyWyoming Supreme Court · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.