Legal Opinion

Opitz v. Opitz

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 2007No. S-07-0015PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Justice.

[11] Gary Kent Opitz challenges the amount of child support ordered by the district court. We affirm the district court's decision.

ISSUES

[12] Mr. Opitz presents these two issues for our review:

1. Whether the district court abused its discretion by imputing income to Mr. Opitz in determining his child support obligation.

2. Whether the district court violated Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 20-2-307(b) (Lexis-Nexis 2007) by failing to set forth specific findings for deviating from Wyo ming's presumptive - child guidelines. support

Ms. Opitz presents an additional issue:

8. Whether Ms. Opitz…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Paul v. PaulWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Bereman v. BeremanWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Hendrickson v. HendricksonWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Raymond v. RaymondWyoming Supreme Court · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Appalachian Railcar Services, Inc. v. Boatright Enterprises, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
  2. Womack v. SwanWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Andrew P. Johnson v. Katie L. JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Egan v. EganWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Randall Thomas Bailey v. Sara Elizabeth BaileyWyoming Supreme Court · 2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API