Legal Opinion
Marshall v. SSC Nashville Operating Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 18, 2017No. 16-5751UnpublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOGGS, Circuit Judge.
This is a straightforward arbitration case. The plaintiff, Peggy Marshall, filed a claim in federal district court against her employer, operated by SSC Nashville, alleging wage discrimination and improper termination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) and the Tennessee Human Rights Act (THRA). Pursuant to the terms of her employment contract, her claims were transferred to a private arbitrator. After discovery and a hearing, the arbitrator denied both of Marshall’s claims. Marshall responded by filing a motion in district court to vacate or modify the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Mickey v. Zeidler Tool and Die Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bay Shore Power Co. v. Oxbow Energy SolutionsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Altruist, LLC v. Medex Patient Transp., LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018
- Arabian Motors v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Bradley v. FOUNTAIN BLEU HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER, INC.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Hale v. StanleyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.