Legal Opinion

Doherty's Case

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 2, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

In this • proceeding under the workmen’s compensation act, the question to be decided is the dependency of the claimant. The employee was injured while in the course of his employment and died as a result of his injuries on April 19, 1929. He was twenty-two years of age and lived with his father and mother. His brother and sister paid a part of their wages to their mother; she testified that “she considers [these payments] for their board.” The claimant, the father of the deceased, is a police officer and was paid $42 a week. There was evidence that the deceased paid his mother “about $15 a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fierro's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Kenney's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. McMahon's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  4. Ferriter's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Dembinski's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Musgrave's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Hoehn's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  3. Foy v. Juilliard Co., Inc., Atl. M'ls Div.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1939
  4. Connors's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Merchant's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API