Legal Opinion

Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. McMahon

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 30, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, District Judge.

This is an action to recover an alleged overpayment of the documentary stamp tax, in the amount of $49,817.25. Both parties move for summary judgment. Defendant’s motion is granted; plaintiff’s motion is denied.

The controversy grows out of a recapitalization of the plaintiff, in the year 1950, in which it issued to the holder of each share of common stock three additional shares of the same stated value. Plaintiff claims that the new stock certificates were not taxable because they were not accompanied by a dedication of additional capital. Defendant claims that they…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Lyeth v. HoeySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Commissioner v. Estate of BedfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Ruth Halle Rowen, Ethel F. Halle, and Edward Halle v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allied Chemical & Dye Corporation v. Denis J. McMahon District Director of Internal Revenue for Lower Manhattan, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  2. The F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API