Griffin v. Boyle
California Supreme Court
Cameron King and Glensor, Clewe & Van Dine for Petitioners. John J. O’Toole, City Attorney, and Frank L. Fenton for Respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.
Application for writ of mandate to compel respondents to appropriate for the conduct of the department of elections the respective amounts itemized and set forth in its budget estimate and to adopt and levy a tax rate sufficient to provide for the amount set forth herein. Writ denied.
The above causes have been consolidated in the argument presented therein to this court, and as they present the same legal problem they will be determined together.
In each a writ of mandate is sought to compel the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco to appropriate for the conduct of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fitzgerald v. BadaraccoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by4 opinions
- Esberg v. BadaraccoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Diamond International Corp. v. BoasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Glensor, Clewe & Van Dine v. AndrianoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Diamond International Corp. v. BoasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979