Legal Opinion

People v. Henry

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 3, 2013No. Court of Appeals No. 12CA0786PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JUDGE LICHTENSTEIN

{1 Defendant, Gesere Q. Henry, appeals his sentence, arguing that the district court erred in denying him any, presentence confinement credit (PSCC). Because we conclude that the court misapprehended its authority under the PSCC statute, we reverse that portion of defendant's sentence and remand for the court to amend the mittimus as directed in this opinion.

I. Background

2 While on mandatory parole in another case, defendant was charged with numerous offenses in this case. He later pleaded guilty to an added count of attempted sexual assault on a child in exchange…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schubert v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. Mr. & Mrs. Doe Parents No. 1 v. State, Department of EducationHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. CarrilloColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. People v. RoyColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Town of Breckenridge v. Egencia, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2018

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peo v. MitchellColorado Court of Appeals · 2024
  2. Peo v. MitchellColorado Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API