Legal Opinion

Ex parte Marks

California Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1883PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Application for habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the ojiinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The petitioner, who was undergoing imprisonment in the State prison under judgment of conviction of the crime of murder in the second degree, was, by the governor of the State, granted a pardon upon condition that he forthwith leave the State and never return thereto. The governor, it seems, was induced to grant the pardon upon representations made to him to the effect that the prisoner was partially idiotic, that his parents resided in Poland and would take care of him if permitted to go to them, and that he had brothers of wealth in this State who would furnish him with the means necessary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lee v. MurphySupreme Court of Virginia · 1872
  2. Flavell's CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RidleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. State v. HorneSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  3. In re ProutIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  4. State Ex Rel. Gordon v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  5. In Re PetersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API