Diar v. Genesco, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANN ALDRICH, District Judge.
Pending before this Court is defendants’ Motion for Leave to File a Third Party Complaint, naming Bic Corporation of Milford, Connecticut (“BIC”) as a defendant, in this personal injury action. Upon consideration, the Motion is denied.
I
The plaintiffs, Nichole Diar and her parents, residents of Ohio, brought this diversity action against the defendants, Genes-co, Inc. (“Genesco”) and Greensboro Manufacturing Company (“Greensboro”), corporations organized under the laws of the state of Tennessee and New York, respectively. Jurisdiction is proper…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Mutual Life Assurance Co. of America v. Arthur Andersen & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Delco Wire & Cable Co. v. Keystone Roofing Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Mountain Pride Farms, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Rodeheaver v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
3Cited by2 opinions
- Trane U.S. Inc. v. MeehanDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- First Health Group Corp. v. Medical Mutual of OhioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024