Legal Opinion

Diar v. Genesco, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided July 18, 1984No. Civ. A. No. C82-2813PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANN ALDRICH, District Judge.

Pending before this Court is defendants’ Motion for Leave to File a Third Party Complaint, naming Bic Corporation of Milford, Connecticut (“BIC”) as a defendant, in this personal injury action. Upon consideration, the Motion is denied.

I

The plaintiffs, Nichole Diar and her parents, residents of Ohio, brought this diversity action against the defendants, Genes-co, Inc. (“Genesco”) and Greensboro Manufacturing Company (“Greensboro”), corporations organized under the laws of the state of Tennessee and New York, respectively. Jurisdiction is proper…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Mutual Life Assurance Co. of America v. Arthur Andersen & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  2. Delco Wire & Cable Co. v. Keystone Roofing Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Mountain Pride Farms, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  4. Rodeheaver v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Trane U.S. Inc. v. MeehanDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
  2. First Health Group Corp. v. Medical Mutual of OhioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API