Legal Opinion

Randy Russell v. Whirlpool Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 17, 2012No. 12-1451PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYE, Circuit Judge.

A fire destroyed the home of Randy and Antoinette Russell. The Russells filed suit against Whirlpool, alleging the fire was caused by a defective refrigerator Whirlpool designed, manufactured, and sold. The jury found in favor of the Russells. Whirlpool appeals, contending the Russells’ expert witness did not use a sufficiently reliable methodology, the Russells may not infer a product defect from circumstantial evidence under Missouri tort law, and the district court 1 erroneously allowed the Russells to introduce evidence of other Whirlpool refrigerator fires. For the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. C. Thomas RYTHER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KARE 11, an NBC Affiliate; Gannett Co., Inc., Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  4. In Re Zurn Pex Plumbing Products LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  5. prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 15,525 Juan Jaurequi v. Carter Manufacturing Co., Inc., John Deere Company Deere & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. Jeffrey Klingenberg v. Vulcan Ladder USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. James Robert CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  3. Corey Sanders v. Joe Page, IIICourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  4. Peters v. Woodbury CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013
  5. Tarshish Jones v. City of Kansas City, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API