Legal Opinion

Coleman v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 5, 1973PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

-Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on January 28, 1972, in plaintiff’s favor in this negligence action after a jury trial on the issue of liability only, affirmed. Respondent shall recover of appellant $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. The Trial Justice did not charge, as stated in the dissent, that “ all employees, even those no longer in the employ of the defendant, were interested witnesses.” He did correctly charge that Sigreti, even though he is no longer in defendant’s employ, was an interested witness. Sigreti was concededly an interested witness. He was the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Noseworthy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Hoffman v. Florida East Coast Hotel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  3. Jobman v. T. Hogan & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  4. Jobman v. T. Hogan Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Doyle v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Levo v. GreenwaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Schwartz v. Maimonides Hospital CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API