Legal Opinion
United States v. Kernen Constr.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 16, 2018No. 2:17-cv-01424 WBS DMCPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff brought this action against defendants Kernen Construction ("Kernen") and Bundy & Sons, Inc. d/b/a Bundy & Sons Logging ("Bundy"), alleging claims of negligence under a theory of respondeat superior and trespass by fire, and seeking a declaratory judgment that California Health & Safety Code § 13009.2 (" Section 13009.2") is unconstitutional and inapplicable to the claims brought by the United States. (First Am. Compl. (Docket No. 43).) Before the court are plaintiff's (Docket No. 58) and intervenor defendant California Forestry…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- (PC) Caruso v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020