Legal Opinion

Bolivar v. Dick

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1996No. 1995-0372PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 76 Ohio St.3d 216.] VILLAGE OF BOLIVAR, APPELLEE, v. DICK, APPELLANT. [Cite as Bolivar v. Dick,

1996-Ohio-409.] Motor vehicles—Driving while intoxicated—Observation requirement of BAC Verifier operational checklist satisfied, when. When two or more officers, one of whom is a certified operator of the BAC Verifier, observe a defendant continuously for twenty minutes or more prior to the administration of a breath-alcohol test, the observation requirement of the BAC Verifier operational checklist has been satisfied. (No.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Defiance v. KretzOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. PlummerOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. SteeleOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Village of Bolivar v. DickOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. Raleigh, 2007-Ca-31 (10-15-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. State v. McLeodOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Cleveland v. HopkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State v. Isbell, 17-08-08 (12-22-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Hernandez v. GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API