Legal Opinion

Magee v. San Francisco Bar Pilots Benevolent & Protective Ass'n

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 1, 1948No. Civ. No. 13788PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action for a declaration of his rights under the articles of incorporation and bylaws of defendant, seeking a determination that he is entitled to an “associate” membership in defendant and, as such, entitled to certain pension rights. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment determining that he is entitled to none of the claimed rights.

The factual background of this controversy is as follows: To guide ships in and out of San Francisco navigators with *281a special knowledge of these waters are required. As early as 1870, by statute, there was created a Board of Pilot…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hunter v. SparlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Estate of HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Supreme Council Catholic Benevolent Legion v. GroveIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Pool v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Robinson v. Irish-American Benevolent SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Frietzsche v. First Western Bank and Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Molumby v. Shapleigh Hardware CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Zimmermann v. BrennanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Frietzsche v. First Western Bank Etc. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API