Legal Opinion
Luckie v. Max Wright, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 13, 1954No. 35165PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
Special ground 4 contends that the court erred in charging the jury as follows: “Where an oral contract to furnish labor and material for the improvement of real estate is entered into by two parties and a contract price is agreed upon but the time of payment of said contract price is not agreed upon, it is implied as a term of the contract that payment of the contract price be made upon the completion of the contract by the party furnishing the labor and the materials for the improvement of the real estate.” In connection with this portion of the charge, the court also charged that the jury…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Campbell & Co. v. Mion Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Minchew v. Nahunta Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Watson v. TOMPKINS CHEVROLET COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Lott-Lewis Co. v. Bingham-Hewett Grain Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Northwest Atlanta Bank v. WillinghamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jones v. ElyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Redman Development Corp. v. Piedmont Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Peachtree Medical Building, Inc. v. KeelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Southern Land, Timber & Pulp Corp. v. Davis & Floyd Engineers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Marsh v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.