Legal Opinion

Raleigh v. Wells

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1905No. 1639PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Salt Lake County; W. C. Hall, Judge. Separate actions by Emily P. Raleigh against Caroline C. R. Wells and others and by the Mutual Investment Company against Emily P. Raleigh. The actions were consolidated, and from the adverse judgment rendered Emily P. Raleigh appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBartch, C. J.

It appears from the record herein that Emily P. Raleigh brought action to quiet title in herself to certain real estate situate in Salt Lake‘City, and that afterwards the Mutual Investment Company, defendant therein, who had purchased the property in reliance upon the will of Alonzo II. Raleigh, the deceased, brought an action against the plaintiff therein to have the title quieted in that company. At the trial both cases were consolidated and tried together; the controversy in the one action being practically the same as in the other, and the parties to the second being also parties to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hardesty v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
  2. Ballard v. WardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  3. Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  4. Allison v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  5. Ogsbury v. . OgsburyNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Essential Botanical Farms, LC v. KayUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. JONES v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1950
  3. First Security Bank of Utah, N.A. v. HallUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Boland v. Nihlros Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1930
  5. First Security Bank of Utah, N.A. v. HallUtah Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API