Legal Opinion

Stoutner v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided February 1, 2001No. 01-98-01317-CRPublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

TAFT, Justice.

Appellant, Stephen Douglas Stoutner, was charged by information with driving while intoxicated (DWI). After a jury found appellant guilty, the trial court assessed punishment at one year community supervision and a $750 fine. We address appellant’s complaints of: (1) the denial of his motion to quash the information based on its failure to properly plead manner and means; (2) the denial of his motion to suppress evidence because the initial stop was not predicated on reasonable suspicion or probable cause; (3) the denial of an article 88.23 (statutory…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  5. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Kuciemba v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  2. Hearne v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  3. Shpikula v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  4. Vrba v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2002
  5. Domingo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API