Legal Opinion
Janssen Products, L.P. v. Lupin Ltd.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 14, 2014No. 2:10-CV-05954 WHWPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLS, Senior District Judge.
By complaints, Plaintiff patent-holders and drug-makers have sued Defendant generic drug manufacturers for alleged infringements of patents on a chemical compound used in the manufacture of Plaintiff’s product, Prezista. The patents, for this opinion, are U.S. Patent No. 7,700,645 B2 (the “'645 Patent”), U.S. Patent No. 7, 126,015 B2 (the “'015 Patent”), and U.S. Patent No. 7,772,411 B2 (the “'411 Patent”).
Prezista is an ethanolate form of the chemical compound named darunavir. The '015 Patent claims processes for manufacturing a chemical structure or…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Colorado v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Composite Resources Inc v. Recon Medical LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022
- I.M. WILSON, INC. v. OTVETSTVENNOSTYOU "GRICHKO"District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC. v. ABBOTT LABORATORIESDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- Novaplast Corporation v. Inplant, LLC, et al.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. Lupin LimitedDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024