Legal Opinion
Jutras v. Satters, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided October 3, 1950No. N 3933PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, C. J.
It is not disputed that the plaintiff was a business visitor and that the defendant “was bound to exercise ordinary care to protect her against dangers reasonably to be apprehended.” Roy v. Amoskeag Fabrics, 93 N. EL 324, 325; Holmes v. Clear Weave Stores, 95 N. H. 478.
The defendant does argue in support of its exception that it was essential for the plaintiff to produce evidence to the effect that the method of construction used by the defendant was not in accordance with proper building practice.
If a case cannot be decided intelligently by application to the evidence of common knowledge or…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. ScielzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Frankovitch v. BurtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Phillips v. Delaware Power & Light CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
- Brann v. Exeter Clinic, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Pridham v. Cash & Carry Building Center, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.