Legal Opinion
Hartline v. Clary
District Court, E.D. South Carolina
Decided May 5, 1956No. Civ. A. 3688, 3689PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, District Judge.
These two actions were brought in the State Court against the defendants and were removed to this court on the ground that the defendants were special agents of the Alcohol & Tobacco Tax Division of the United States Treasury Department, and were acting as such at the times mentioned in the complaints.
The complaints alleged that while the plaintiffs were on duty as officers of the Charleston County Police Department, the defendants as special agents of the Alcohol & Tobacco. Tax Division of the United States Treasury did with malice and without proper cause and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Gregoire v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Spalding v. VilasSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Yaselli v. GoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Randall v. BrighamSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Webster Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of NarcoticsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Virgil Norton, Virgil Wesley and James Chapman v. James P. McShaneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Florence O'CampO v. Edna Hardisty, Paul H. Wright, R. v. Rushford, N. P. Hughes and N. DrakulichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Industrial Commission v. Superior Court in and for County of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Sophie Bershad v. Wilson B. Wood and Samuel L. BergerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.