Legal Opinion

Rupp v. Teets, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 24, 1954No. 14241_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Rupp has appealed from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 117 F. Supp. 376, denying him a writ of habeas corpus. The Warden moves to dismiss the appeal as frivolous, contending that the application shows on its face that Rupp has not exhausted his state remedies by petitioning a California state court for the issuance of the writ.

Rupp, in San Quentin, as well could have petitioned the Supreme Court of California, which was then in session in San Francisco, for his writ of habeas corpus as applying to the district court in that city. The state…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rupp v. TeetsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Willie Gray Dixon, Jr. v. State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. In re BlaineNew York City Family Court · 1967
  3. Donovan v. DelgadoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1971
  4. In re RuppDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API