Legal Opinion

In re Rupp

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 24, 1955No. 34686PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARD P. MURPHY, District Judge.

Petitioner, William Francis Rupp, seeks a Writ of Habeas Corpus to test the legality of his detention in the California State Prison at San Quentin, where he is awaiting execution under a sentence of the Superior Court of the County of Orange, of the State of California.

This is petitioner’s second appearance in this court. His first petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus was denied on the ground that he had failed to exhaust his state remedies. Rupp v. Teets, D.C.N.D.Cal.1953, 117 F.Supp. 376. That ruling was affirmed in 9 Cir., 214 F.2d 312, and certiorari was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Williams v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. People v. RuppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Garcia v. LandonSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Rupp v. Teets, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rupp v. TeetsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API