United States v. Hatfield
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
COX, Chief Judge:
This is a speedy-trial appeal. At trial, the military judge granted appellant’s in limine motion to dismiss the Charges and specifications for want of a speedy trial. Art. 10, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 810. The Government took an interlocutory appeal of this ruling to the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals. Art. 62, UCMJ, 10 USC § 862 (1983). That court held that, under the circumstances, “the military judge erred as a matter of law” in granting appellant’s motion. Accordingly, the court granted the government appeal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. KossmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
- United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. WattenbargerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. HatfieldNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. MizgalaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
- United States v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
- United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
- United States v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
- United States v. WarnerU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.