Legal Opinion
Manuela Villa v. Maricopa County
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 2, 2017No. 15-15460PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Law enforcement officials in Maricopa County intercepted and recorded eight conversations between Plaintiff Manuela Villa and her daughter in 2011 and 2012. The target phone number over which Villa’s conversations were intercepted belonged to neither Villa nor her daughter. The wiretap application was authorized by Maricopa County Attorney William G. Montgomery, but the application was made by Deputy County Attorney Jennifer Brockel. Before making the application, Brockel personally reviewed a lengthy supporting affidavit. Montgomery did not review the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Campbell v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- City of Philadelphia v. SessionsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Peter Stavrianoudakis v. UsfwsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- American Bankers Management Co v. Eric HeryfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Stafne v. ZillyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2018
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.