Legal Opinion

Weems, Receiver v. Masterson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1891No. 3079PublishedCited by 64 opinions

The opinion gives a statement.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

The land in controversy formerly belonged to Mrs. Masterson, nee Ewing, and Alexander Ewing, and she is entitled to the judgment rendered in the court below in her favor, unless title to the land passed by a sale made by her guardians through whom appellant claims as receiver of the property of the City Bank of Houston.

Appellant’s title rests on proceedings of the Probate Court for Harris County, which began with the following petition filed by the guardians of her estate and of that of Alexander Ewing:

"State of Texas, County of Harris.—To the Honorable the Probate…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murchison v. White, 54 Tex. 78 (Tex. 1880)Texas Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Martin v. Robinson, 67 Tex. 368 (Tex. 1887)Texas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Guilford v. LoveTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Alexander v. MaverickTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Mills v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1858

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Holland v. NanceTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Welch v. FochtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Hannon v. HensonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  4. Bouldin v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Hartel v. DishmanTexas Supreme Court · 1940

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API