Bouldin v. Miller
Texas Supreme Court
Error to Court of Civil Appeals for Second District, in an appeal from Wise County. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
DERMAR, Associate Justice.
Plaintiffs in error, James and Powhatan Bouldin, sued defendant Miller in trespass to try title to recover the land in controversy, and defendant pleaded not guilty. Thereupon plaintiffs filed a paper alleging no facts, but offering to refund any sum the court might find chargeable to them on account of any money received by their alleged guardian, who sold the land. This paper presents no issue, and the case will be considered as one of ordinary trespass to try title, with plea of not guilty.
James E. Bouldin, the common source of title, in 1876, in due form of law…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Weems, Receiver v. MastersonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Laval v. StaffelTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Doebler's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
- Dougal v. FryerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1831
- Erskine v. MessicarMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by47 opinions
- Moore v. HanscomTexas Supreme Court · 1908
- Stewart v. USA Custom Paint & Body Shop, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
- Frame v. WhitakerTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- Hannon v. HensonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Benson v. Greenville Nat. Exchange BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.