Legal Opinion
Noethinger v. Jeffries
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 15, 1919PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Motion by a purchaser at a partition sale to be relieved of Ms purchase.
1Opinion of the CourtCropsby, J.
The purchaser at a partition sale moves to he relieved of his purchase. He contends that the deed tendered by the referee, and which he refused, did not convey marketable title or one free and clear of all encumbrances. The terms of sale did not mention any encumbrances. The purchaser raises four questions under his contention.
1. A guardian ad litem was appointed for an infant defendant but the order appointing him did not provide for the filing of a bond. And no bond was filed until after the sale, when the purchaser raised the objection. Then under an order obtained from the court a bond…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Riggs v. . PursellNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Riggs v. . PursellNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Croghan v. . LivingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Anderson v. Steinway & SonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Anderson v. . Steinway SonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cahill v. CahillNew York Supreme Court · 1927
- Paragon Progressive Federal Credit Union v. HendersonNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Rego Crescent Corp. v. Flagship Air Service Transfer, Inc. (In re Rego Crescent Corp.)District Court, E.D. New York · 1983