Legal Opinion
Cahill v. Cahill
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 27, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam F. Dowling, J.
The above application is a special proceeding. (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 4, 5; Parish v. Parish, 175 N. Y. 181, 184.)
The above action was commenced by the filing of a summons and complaint and notice of pendency in the Oneida county clerk’s office on May 26, 1927. The action involves a partition of a parcel of land known as 1005 George place, Utica, N. Y. All of the defendants in the action were personally served within the State of New York except Elizabeth Cahill, Marie J. Alter, Cecelia P. Gilbert and Gertrude C. Norman. The defendant Cecelia P. Gilbert on the 21st of June, 1927, in the city of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jordan v. . PoillonNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Hewlett v. . WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- White v. . BogartNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Parish v. . ParishNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Miller v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lansdale v. LansdaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- Friedman v. BlattNew York Supreme Court · 1940