Legal Opinion

In re Deering

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 6, 1998No. 97-BG-552Published

1Per curiam

There are two disciplinary matters against Richard C. Deering, a reciprocal proceeding-based on his disbarment by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Columbia, and an original disciplinary proceeding for violations of three ethical rales in an unrelated matter. Respondent has already been disbarred by this court. See In re Deering, 692 A.2d 1378 (D.C.1997). Therefore, the Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that no additional sanction be imposed, but that findings of misconduct be adopted to preserve the record for future use in the event Deering petitions for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of JonesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. In re SolerwitzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. In Re HerndonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. In re DeeringDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API