Legal Opinion · Dissent

The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. L. K. Comstock & Company, Inc., a New York Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 24, 1982No. 80-5368Published

1DissentNorris, Circuit Judge

We seldom encounter a case which may be resolved on the basis of black letter law. Here we are presented with just such a case. Although state worker’s compensation schemes typically provide that an employer’s liability under the worker’s compensation system is an exclusive liability, “[t]he clearest exception to the exclusive-liability clause is the third party’s right to enforce an express contract in which the employer agrees to indemnify the third party for the very kind of loss that the third party has been made to pay to the employee.” 2A A. Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 76.42…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faythe S. Takahashi and Hideo H. Takahashi v. Loomis Armored Car Service, and Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. Outboard Marine Corp. v. SchupbachNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  4. City of Artesia v. CarterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Redford v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API