Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Curry

California Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1902No. S.F. No. 3355PublishedCited by 19 opinions

APPLICATION in the Supreme Court for writ of mandate to the Secretary of State. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Plaintiff's pray for a writ of mandate, directing the secretary of state to certify to the registrar of voters of the city and county of San Francisco the nomination of Edward J. Livernash as the candidate of the Democratic party for member of the House of Representatives from the fourth congressional district. Mr. Livernash had received the nomination from the Union Labor party, and also from the Democratic party. Each of the parties filed with the secretary of state, as required by law, a certificate in due form of the nomination of Mr. Livernash. The Union Labor party’s certificate was the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Runge v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Britton v. Board of Election CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Todd v. Boards of Election CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Eaton v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GerinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Spreckels v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. State ex rel. Shepard v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Libertarian Party v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. People ex rel. Schnackenberg v. CzarneckiIllinois Supreme Court · 1912

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API