Legal Opinion

Douglass v. Stanger

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 22, 2000No. 18145-6-IIIPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

A security has been defined liberally and broadly to include any note. In fact, there is a presumption that every note is a security. Reves v. Ernst & Young, 494 U.S. 56, 65, 110 S. Ct. 945, 108 L. Ed. 2d 47 (1990). In this *246case, Harlan Douglass gave Kenneth Stanger $23,000 in exchange for a promissory note and an “Investment Agreement” promising a 40 percent ownership interest in a shopping center property and development. Mr. Stanger then formed another corporation with Orville Barnes; and together they developed the shopping center — without Mr. Douglass. The first question presented is…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,614 the Exchange National Bank of Chicago v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  4. Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Allen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Burns v. McClintonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  2. Guarino v. Interactive Objects, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. Guarino v. Interactive Objects, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. Burns v. McClintonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. Stewart v. Estate of SteinerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API