Douglass v. Stanger
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
A security has been defined liberally and broadly to include any note. In fact, there is a presumption that every note is a security. Reves v. Ernst & Young, 494 U.S. 56, 65, 110 S. Ct. 945, 108 L. Ed. 2d 47 (1990). In this *246case, Harlan Douglass gave Kenneth Stanger $23,000 in exchange for a promissory note and an “Investment Agreement” promising a 40 percent ownership interest in a shopping center property and development. Mr. Stanger then formed another corporation with Orville Barnes; and together they developed the shopping center — without Mr. Douglass. The first question presented is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,614 the Exchange National Bank of Chicago v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Allen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Burns v. McClintonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Guarino v. Interactive Objects, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Guarino v. Interactive Objects, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Burns v. McClintonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Stewart v. Estate of SteinerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.