Legal Opinion

Damon Schexnider v. E-Cig Central, LLC LG Chem, Ltd. Shenzhen IMR Technology Co., Ltd. And Shenzhen Fest Technology Co., Ltd.

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided November 25, 2020No. 06-20-00003-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-20-00003-CV DAMON SCHEXNIDER, Appellant V. E-CIG CENTRAL, LLC; LG CHEM, LTD.; SHENZHEN IMR TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.; AND SHENZHEN FEST TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018-2259-CCL2 Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss MEMORANDUM OPINION In 2017, Damon Schexnider purchased vaping/e-cigarette equipment, including an 186501 lithium-ion battery (HG2 battery)2 packaged for use with the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API