Legal Opinion

Setsuko M. Geis, and v. United States of America and Masako Geis, And

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 27, 1968No. 21424_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

404 F.2d 154

Setsuko M. GEIS, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES of America and Masako Geis, Defendants and Appellees.

No. 21424.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Nov. 8, 1968, Rehearing Denied Dec. 27, 1968.

George S. Lundin (argued), of Geraghty, Lundin & Geraghty, Seattle, Wash., for appellant.

Albert E. Stephan (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Eugene G. Cushing, U.S. Atty., Seattle, Wash., for the United States.

Casey & Pruzan, Phillip Hutchison (argued), Seattle Wash., for appellee Masako Geis.

Before CHAMBERS, MERRILL and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges.

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge:

1

Walter W.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
  2. Candelario A. Aguilar v. United States of America and Frances G. AguilarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  3. Howard J. Benard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  4. Mary M. Behrens v. United States of America, and Wilda L. DinnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  5. Moore v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API