Legal Opinion

Mary M. Behrens v. United States of America, and Wilda L. Dinnell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 15, 1962No. 17458PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLIN, Circuit Judge.

The problem presented by this case is whether Henry Dinnell, a deceased serviceman, effectively changed the beneficiary of his National Service Life' Insurance from his former wife, Mary M. Behrens, the appellant herein, to his widow, Wilda L. Dinnell, the appellee herein 1

A suit was brought in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Northern Division, under the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 784 after the Veterans Administration Board of Veterans Appeals had determined that Henry Dinnell had changed the beneficiary of his National Service…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
  2. Gann v. MeekCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
  3. Kendig v. KendigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  4. Candelario A. Aguilar v. United States of America and Frances G. AguilarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  5. Imajean Hawkins v. Bertha Lue HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Howard J. Benard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  2. Spaulding v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Mary L. Baker v. United States of America and Caroline S. GardenhireCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. Hill v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Benard v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API