Legal Opinion
Van Wie v. C. M. Gridley & Son, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 17, 1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtLouis G. Bruhn, J.
This is a motion on behalf of the defendant, C. M. Gridley & Son, Inc., for an order compelling the plaintiff to accept its amended answer.
The above-captioned action was started by the service of a summons on October 10, 1960; a notice of appearance served by the defendant on December 5, 1960; a complaint served on or about December 23, 1960 and answer interposed on or about April 4, 1961.
This defendant claims that its rights may be prejudiced if it is not permitted to plead the defense of workmen’s compensation since if it is established that the plaintiff and the operator of its crane were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Charles v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Bartolomeo v. Charles Bennett Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- McNamara v. . LeipzigNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Ramsey v. New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Morris v. LuckNew York Supreme Court · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Van Wie v. C. M. Gridley & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964