Legal Opinion
Morris v. Luck
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 3, 1961PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.
This motion is made by defendants Luck for permission to amend their answer to plead as an affirmative defense the fact that plaintiff was at the time of the accident a fellow employee of defendant Martin Luck, who was operating a car owned by defendant Frieda Luck in which plaintiff was a passenger. When the motion first came on, this court stated that it was ‘ ‘ constrained to grant the motion, unless it can be said that defendants are estopped from pleading it ’ ’ (Morris v. Luck, N. Y. L. J., Jan. 17, 1961, p. 15, col. 8). The matter was set for hearing on the question of estoppel, but it…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Judson v. FieldingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Levy v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Judson v. FieldingNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Drescher v. MirkusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Massi v. Alben Builders, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bingham v. BattistaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Hamilton v. BendickNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Van Wie v. C. M. Gridley & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Van Wie v. C. M. Gridley & Son, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962
- Carrillo v. Greenpoint Terminal Warehouse, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.