Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. London

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1964No. A-9601Published

1DissentSmith, Justice

I respectfully dissent. The cause was tried to a jury. The trial court entered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, but not to the' extent prayed for in his motion for- judgment.-. On appeal, the Court of *308Civil Appeals, in effect, granted plaintiff’s motion for judgment by reversing the judgment of the trial court and rendering judgment for the plaintiff for more compensation than awarded by the trial court. 366 S.W.2d 263.

Plaintiff’s original petition was filed on June 28, 1961. Plaintiff’s pleadings, as originally filed, alleged a cause of action against the defendant, claiming…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Texas Employers' Ins. v. MorenoTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Texas Employers' Insurance v. BrownleeTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. PollardTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  4. Texas Employers Insurance v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. MaledonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API