Mincieli v. Bruder
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW
HIGHSMITH, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendant Audrey Bruder’s renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law and/or motion for judgment notwithstanding verdict, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 50. Preliminarily, the Court notes that the 1991 revisions to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure abolished the terms “directed verdict” and “judgment notwithstanding verdict,” in favor of the all inclusive term “judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 50 advisory committee’s note. Therefore, the Court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Charles H. Von Stein v. George A. BrescherCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harris v. District Board of Trustees of Polk Community CollegeDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1998
- Coletta v. the City of North Bay VillageDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1997
- Harris v. DIST. BD. TRUSTEES OF POLK COMMUNITY COLLEGEDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1998
- Mincieli v. BruderCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995