Isthmian Steamship Co. v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOCK, District Judge.
Libelant in A. 185-33, Isthmian Steamship Company, excepts to certain articles of the answer and seeks a decree pro con-fesso. Respondent in the same action, the United States of America, moves, pursuant to Rule 13 of the Admiralty Rules of this court, for an order consolidating the two suits which are captioned above. Hereinafter I will refer to A. 185-33 as “Isthmian’s suit” and to A. 185-274 as “the government’s suit”.
Isthmian’s suit, commenced by libel filed on March 29, 1955, is brought to recover from the government the sum of $115,203.76 alleged to be the unpaid…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United Transportation & Lighterage Co. v. New York & Baltimore Transp. LineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
- CLIMATIC RAINWEAR, CO. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
- United Transp. & Lighterage Co. v. New York & Baltimore Transp. LineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1910
- The YankeeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1941
- France & Canada S. S. Corp. v. French RepublicDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Isthmian Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Grace Line, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Sea Trade Corp. v. Bethlehem Steel Co., Shipbuilding DivisionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961